Their patronage of Tamil literature+ and their zeal in the building of temples has resulted in some great works of Tamil literature and architecture. The Chola kings were avid builders and envisioned the temples in their kingdoms not only as places of worship but also as centres of economic activity.Vasudevan, pp 20–22 They pioneered a centralised form of government+ and established a disciplined bureaucracy. During the Imperial Chola period urbanization increased and there was a tremendous agrarian expansion and well-developed system of water management. During this period the economy and particularly trade flourished because of the emergence of prosperous and well-organized Tamil merchant guilds which controlled long-distance trade. The Chola school of art spread to Southeast Asia+ and influenced the architecture and art of Southeast Asia+.
According to the Malay chronicle Sejarah Melayu the rulers of the Malacca sultanate+ claimed to be descendants of the kings of the Chola Empire. Even today the Chola rule is remembered in Malaysia+ as many Malaysian+ princes have names ending with Cholan or Chulan, one such was the Raja of Perak+ called Raja Chulan+.
There is very little information available regarding the origin of the Chola Dynasty. The antiquity of this dynasty is evident from the mentions in ancient Pali-Tamil literature+ and in inscriptions. Later medieval Cholas+ also claimed a long and ancient lineage to their dynasty. Mentions in the early Sangam literature+ (c. 150 CE)The age of Sangam is established through the correlation between the evidence on foreign trade found in the poems and the writings by ancient Greek and Romans such as ''Periplus''. K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of Cyril and Lulu Charles'', p 106 indicate that the earliest kings of the dynasty antedated 100 CE. Parimelalagar, the annotator of the Tamil classic Tirukkural+, mentions that this could be the name of an ancient king.
The most commonly held view is that this is, like Cheras+ and Pandyas, the name of the ruling family or clan of immemorial antiquity. The annotator Parimelazhagar writes "The charity of people with ancient lineage (such as the Cholas, the Pandyas and the Cheras) are forever generous in spite of their reduced means". Other names in common use for the Cholas are ''Killi'' (கிள்ளி), ''Valavan'' (வளவன்) and ''Sembiyan'' (செம்பியன்). ''Killi'' perhaps comes from the Tamil ''kil'' (கிள்) meaning dig or cleave and conveys the idea of a digger or a worker of the land. This word often forms an integral part of early Chola names like Nedunkilli+, Nalankilli+ and so on, but almost drops out of use in later times. ''Valavan'' is most probably connected with "''valam''" (வளம்) – fertility and means owner or ruler of a fertile country. ''Sembiyan'' is generally taken to mean a descendant of Shibi+ – a legendary hero whose self-sacrifice in saving a dove from the pursuit of a falcon figures among the early Chola legends and forms the subject matter of the Sibi Jataka+ among the Jataka+ stories of Buddhism+. In Tamil lexicon ''Chola'' means ''Soazhi'' or ''Saei'' denoting a newly formed kingdom, in the lines of ''Pandya'' or the old country. ''Sora'' or ''Chozha'' in Tamil becomes ''Chola'' and ''Chola'' or ''Choda'' in Telugu+.
On the history of the early Cholas there is very little authentic written evidence available. Historians during the past 150 years have gleaned a lot of knowledge on the subject from a variety of sources such as ancient Tamil Sangam literature, oral traditions, religious texts, temple and copperplate inscriptions+. The main source for the available information of the early Cholas is the early Tamil literature of the Sangam Period.The period covered by the Sangam poetry is likely to extend not longer than five or six generations – K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 3 There are also brief notices on the Chola country and its towns, ports and commerce furnished by the ''Periplus of the Erythraean Sea+'' (''Periplus Maris Erythraei'').The ''Periplus'' refers to the region of the eastern seaboard of South India as ''Damirica '' – (Ancient History source book). ''Periplus'' is a work by an anonymous Alexandria+n merchant, written in the time of Domitian+ (81–96) and contains very little information of the Chola country. Writing half a century later, the geographer Ptolemy+ gives more detail about the Chola country, its port and its inland cities.Ptolemy mentions the town of Kaveripattinam+ (under the form ''Khaberis'') – ''Proceedings, American Philosophical Society'' (1978), vol. 122, No. 6, p 414 ''Mahavamsa+'', a Buddhist+ text written down during the 5th century CE, recounts a number of conflicts between the inhabitants of Ceylon+ and Cholas in the 1st century BCE.Mahavamsa eText – http://lakdiva.org/mahavamsa/ Cholas are mentioned in the Pillars of Ashoka+ (inscribed 273 BCE–232 BCE) inscriptions, where they are mentioned among the kingdoms which, though not subject to Ashoka, were on friendly terms with him.The Ashokan inscriptions speak of the Cholas in plural, implying that, in his time, there were more than one Chola – K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 20. However, this analogy is doubtful because the same inscription, all the kings either friendly or subordinate to the Mauryan Empire have been referred to in plural for e.g., subordinates like the Greeks, the Kambojas, the Nabhakas, the Nabhapamkits, the Bhojas, the Pitinikas, the Andhras and the Palidas or friendly empires have been called 'Cholas' and 'Pandyas' and as far as Tamraparani or modern Sri Lanka – significantly the word 'Tamraparani' does not clearly mean territory ruled by one or more kings. It is indeed a known fact that for most of their history though, the Pandyas ruled their dominions with members of the same family dividing their empire into various parts and controlling various aspects of administration of their territories. The Cholas too followed the same practice with sons of the Chola emperors controlling various parts or aspects of their territories or administration along with their relatives or allies who bore the common title 'Chola'. This knowledge about the friendly empires of both 'Pandyas' and 'Cholas' must have prompted Ashoka to refer to them thus. Link: http://www.cs.colostate.edu/~malaiya/ashoka.html
The earliest Chola kings for whom there is tangible evidence are mentioned in the Sangam literature. Scholars generally agree that this literature belongs to the second or first few centuries of the common era+. The internal chronology of this literature is still far from settled, and at present a connected account of the history of the period cannot be derived. The Sangam literature records the names of the kings and the princes, and of the poets who extolled them. Despite a rich literature that depicts the life and work of these people, these cannot be worked into connected history.
The Sangam literature also records legends about mythical Chola kings.Manimekalai+ (poem 00-10) These myths speak of the Chola king Kantaman, a supposed contemporary of the sage Agastya+, whose devotion brought the river Kaveri into existence.Manimekalai (poem 22-030) Besides, two names stand out prominently from among those Chola kings known to have existed who feature in Sangam literature: Karikala Chola+ and Kocengannan+.Kulke and Rothermund, p 104Tripathi, p 458K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', p 116 There are no sure means of settling the order of succession, of fixing their relations with one another and with many other princelings of about the same period.The only evidence for the approximate period of these early kings is the Sangam Literature and the synchronization with the history of Sri Lanka+ as given in the Mahavamsa. Gajabahu I+ who is said to be the contemporary of the Chera Senguttuvan+ is determined to belong to the 2nd century. This leads us to date the poems mentioning Senguttuvan and his contemporaries to belong to this period. Urayur+ (now in/part-of Thiruchirapalli+) was their oldest capital.Kaveripattinam+ also served as an early Chola capital. The ''Mahavamsa+'' mentions that an ethnic Tamil adventurer, a Chola prince known as Elara+, invaded the island around 235 BCE.
There is not much information about the transition period of around three centuries from the end of the Sangam age (c. 300) to that in which the Pandyas and Pallava+s dominated the Tamil country. An obscure dynasty, the Kalabhras+ invaded Tamil country, displaced the existing kingdoms and ruled for around three centuries.Thapar, p 268 They were displaced by the Pallava dynasty+ and the Pandyan Dynasty+ in the 6th century. Little is known of the fate of the Cholas during the succeeding three centuries until the accession of Vijayalaya in the second quarter of the 9th century.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', pp 130, 133. Quote:"The Cholas disappeared from the Tamil land almost completely in this debacle, though a branch of them can be traced towards the close of the period in Rayalaseema – the Telugu-Chodas, whose kingdom is mentioned by Yuan Chwang+ in the seventh century A.D
Epigraphy+ and literature provide a few faint glimpses of the transformations that came over this ancient line of kings during this long interval. What is certain is that when the power of the Cholas fell to its lowest ebb and that of the Pandyas and Pallavas rose to the north and south of them,K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 102 this dynasty was compelled to seek refuge and patronage under their more successful rivals.Kulke and Rothermund, p 115Pandya Kadungon+ and Pallava Simhavishnu+ overthrew the Kalabhras. Acchchutakalaba is likely the last Kalabhra king – Nilakanta Sastri, ''The CōĻas'', p 102 The Cholas continued to rule over a diminished territory in the neighbourhood of Uraiyur, but only in a minor capacity. In spite of their reduced powers, the Pandayas and Pallavas accepted Chola princesses in marriage, possibly out of regard for their reputation.''Periyapuranam+'', a Saiva religious work of 12th century tells us of the Pandya king Nindrasirnedumaran, who had for his queen a Chola princess. Chopra ''et al.'', p 95 Numerous inscriptions of Pallavas of this period mention their having fought rulers of 'the Chola country'.Copperplate grants of the Pallava Buddhavarman(late 4th century) mention that the king as the "underwater fire that destroyed the ocean of the Chola army". – Nilakanta Sastri, ''The CōĻas'', pp 104–105 Despite this loss in influence and power, it is unlikely that the Cholas lost total grip of the territory around Uraiyur, their old capital, as Vijayalaya, when he rose to prominence hailed from this geographical area.Chopra ''et al.'', p 95Tripathi, p459
Around the 7th century, a Chola kingdom flourished in present-day Andhra Pradesh. These Telugu Cholas+ (or Chodas) traced their descent to the early Sangam Cholas. However, it is not known if they had any relation to the early Cholas. It is possible that a branch of the Tamil Cholas migrated north during the time of the Pallavas to establish a kingdom of their own, away from the dominating influences of the Pandyas and Pallavas.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+ postulates that there was a live connection between the early Cholas and the Renandu Cholas of the Andhra country. The northward migration probably took place during the Pallava domination of Simhavishnu. Sastri also categorically rejects the claims that these were the descendants of Karikala Chola – K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 107 The Chinese+ pilgrim Xuanzang+, who spent several months in Kanchipuram+ during 639–640 writes about the "kingdom of Culi-ya", in an apparent reference to the Telugu Chodas.
Vijayalaya was the founder of the Imperial Chola Dynasty which was the beginning of one of the most splendid Empires in Indian history. Vijayalaya+, possibly a feudaory of the Pallava dynasty+, took an opportunity arising out of a conflict between the Pandya Dynasty and Pallava Dynasty in c. 850, captured Thanjavur+ from Muttarayar+, and established the imperial line of the medieval Chola Dynasty.Dehejia. p xiv Thanjavur+ became the capital of the Imperial Chola Dynasty.
Rajaraja Chola I+ and Rajendra Chola I+ who were the greatest rulers of the Chola Dynasty extended the Chola Dynasty beyond the traditional limits of a Tamil kingdom. At its peak, the Chola Empire stretched from the island of Sri Lanka in the south to the Godavari+-Krishna+ basin in the north, up to the Konkan coast in Bhatkal, the entire Malabar Coast in addition to Lakshadweep+, Maldives+, and vast areas of Chera+ country. The kingdoms of Deccan and the eastern coast were subordinates, feudatories of the Cholas, and other kingdoms like the Chalukyas+ between paid tribute to the Cholas 1000–1075. Raja Raja Chola I+ was a ruler with inexhaustible energy, and he applied himself to the task of governance with the same zeal that he had shown in waging wars.''The First Spring: The Golden Age of India'' by Abraham Eraly p.68 Raja Raja Chola I+ integrated his Empire into a tight administrative grid under royal control, and at the same time strengthened local self-government. Therefore he conducted a land survey in 1000 CE to effectively marshall the resources of his Empire. Raja Raja Chola I also built the famous Brihadeeswarar Temple+ in 1010 CE which is part of the UNESCO World Heritage Site+.
Rajendra Chola I+ conquered Odisha+ and his armies continued to march further north and defeated the forces of the Pala Dynasty+ of Bengal+ and reached the Ganges River+ in north India. Rajendra Chola I+ built a new capital called Gangaikondacholapuram to celebrate his victories in northern India. Rajendra Chola I+ successfully invaded the Srivijaya+ Empire in Southeast Asia+ which led to the decline of the Srivijaya Empire. The expedition of Rajendra Chola I had such a great impression to the Malay people+ of the medieval period that his name was mentioned in the corrupted form as Raja Chulan in the medieval Malay chronicle Sejarah Melaya. Rajendra Chola I+ completed the conquest of the island of Sri Lanka and captured the Sinhala king Mahinda V as a prisoner, in addition to his conquests of Rattapadi (territories of the Rashtrakutas+, Chalukya+ country, Talakkad+, and Kolar+, where the Kolaramma temple still has his portrait statue) in Kannada country. Rajendra's territories included the area falling on the Ganges-Hooghly-Damodar basin, as well as Sri Lanka and Maldives. The kingdoms along the east coast of India up to the river Ganges+ acknowledged Chola suzerainty. Chola navies invaded and spread their influence to Srivijaya+. Three diplomatic missions were sent to China in 1016, 1033, and 1077.
The Western Chalukya Empire+ under Satyasraya+ and Somesvara I+ tried to wriggle out of Chola domination from time to time, primarily due to the Chola influence in the Vengi+ kingdom. The Western Chalukyas mounted several unsuccessful attempts to engage the Chola emperors in war, and except for a brief occupation of Vengi territories between 1118–1126, all their other attempts ended in failure with successive Chola emperors routing the armies of the Chalukyas at various places in many wars. Virarajendra Chola+ defeated Somesvara II+ of the Western Chalukya Empire+ and made an alliance with Prince Vikramaditya VI+. Cholas always successfully controlled the Chalukyas in the western Deccan+ by defeating them in war and levying tribute on them. Even under the emperors of the Cholas like Kulothunga I and Vikrama Chola, the wars against the Chalukyas were mainly fought in Chalukya territories in Karnataka or in the Telugu country like Vengi, Kakinada, Anantapur, or Gutti. Then the Kannada kingdoms of the Kadambas, Hoysalas, Vaidumbas, or Kalachuris, steadily increased their power and finally replaced the Chalukyas.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'' With the occupation of Dharwar in North Central Karnataka by the Hoysalas+ under Vishnuvardhana+, where he based himself with his son Narasimha I+ in-charge at the Hoysala+ capital Dwarasamudra around 1149, and with the Kalachuris+ occupying the Chalukyan capital for over 35 years from around 1150–1151, the Chalukya kingdom was already starting to dissolve.
The Cholas under Kulothunga Chola III+ even collaborated to the herald the dissolution of the Chalukyas+ by aiding Hoysalas+ under Veera Ballala II+, the son-in-law of the Chola monarch, and defeated the Western Chalukyas+ in a series of wars with Somesvara IV+ between 1185–1190. The last Chalukya king's territories did not even include the erstwhile Chalukyan capitals Badami, Manyakheta or Kalyani. That was the final dissolution of Chalukyan power though the Chalukyas+ existed only in name since 1135–1140. But the Cholas remained stable till 1215, were absorbed by the Pandiyan+ empire and ceased to exist by 1279.
On the other hand, throughout the period from 1150–1280, the staunchest opponents of the Cholas were Pandya princes who tried to win independence for their traditional territories. This period saw constant warfare between the Cholas and the Pandyas. The Cholas also fought regular wars with the Eastern Gangas+ of Kalinga, protected Vengi though it remained largely independent under Chola control, and had domination of the entire eastern coast with their feudatories the Telugu Chodas, Velananti Cholas, Renandu Cholas etc. who also always aided the Cholas+ in their successful campaigns against the Chalukyas+ and levying tribute on the Kannada kingdoms and fought constantly with the Sinhala+s, who attempted to overthrow the Chola occupation of Lanka+, but till the time of the Later Chola+ king Kulottunga I the Cholas had firm control over Lanka+. In fact, a Later Chola+ king Rajadhiraja Chola II+ was strong enough to prevail over a confederation of five Pandya+ princes who were aided by their traditional friend, the king of Lanka+, this once again gave control of Lanka+ to the Cholas despite the fact that they were not strong under the resolute Rajadhiraja Chola II+. However, Rajadhiraja Chola II+'s successor, the last great Chola monarch Kulottunga Chola III+ reinforced the hold of the Cholas by quelling rebellion and disturbances in Lanka+ and Madurai, defeated Hoysala generals under Veera Ballala II in Karuvur, in addition to holding on to his traditional territories in Tamil country, Eastern Gangavadi, Draksharama, Vengi and Kalinga+. After this, he entered into a marital alliance with Veera Ballala II (with Ballala's marriage to a Chola princess) and his relationship with Hoysalas seems to have become friendlier.
Marital and political alliances between the Eastern Chalukyas+ began during the reign of Rajaraja following his invasion of Vengi. Rajaraja Chola's daughter married Chalukya prince Vimaladitya. Rajendra Chola's daughter Ammanga Devi was also married to an eastern Chalukya prince Rajaraja Narendra+.Chopra ''et al.'', p 120 Virarajendra Chola's son Athirajendra Chola+ was assassinated in a civil disturbance in 1070, and Kulothunga Chola I+, the son of the Chola princess Ammanga Devi and Rajaraja Narendra, ascended the Chola throne starting the Later Chola dynasty.
The Later Chola dynasty was led by capable rulers such as Kulothunga Chola I+, his son Vikrama Chola+, other successors like Rajaraja Chola II+, Rajadhiraja Chola II+, and the great Kulothunga Chola III+, who conquered Kalinga+, Ilam+, and Kataha+. However, the rule of the later Cholas between 1218, starting with Rajaraja Chola II+, to the last emperor Rajendra Chola III+ was not as strong as those of the emperors between 850–1215. Around 1118, they lost control of Vengi to the Western Chalukya+ and Gangavadi (southern Mysore+ districts) to the Hoysala Empire+. However, these were only temporary setbacks, because immediately following the accession of king Vikrama Chola+, the son and successor of Kulothunga Chola I+, the Cholas lost no time in recovering the province of Vengi by defeating Chalukya Somesvara III and also recovering Gangavadi from the Hoysalas. The Chola Empire, though not as strong as between 850–1150, was still largely territorially intact under Raja Raja Chola II (1146–1175) a fact attested by the construction and completion of the third grand Chola architectural marvel, the chariot-shaped Airavatesvara Temple+ at Dharasuram on the outskirts of modern Kumbakonam. This temple is part of the World Heritage Sites+ trinity of the Great Living Chola Temples+, along with the Brihadeeswarar Temple+s of Thanjavur+ and Gangaikonda Cholapuram+, built by his predecessors Raja Raja Chola I and Rajendra Chola I, respectively. Chola administration and territorial integrity till the rule of Kulothunga Chola III+ was stable and very prosperous up to 1215, but during his rule itself, the decline of the Chola power started following his defeat by Maravarman Sundara Pandiyan II in 1215–16.Tripathi, p 471 Subsequently, the Cholas also lost control of the island of Lanka and were driven out by the revival of Sinhala power.
In continuation of the decline, also marked by the resurgence of the Pandyan Dynasty+ as the most powerful rulers in South India, a lack of a controlling central administration in its erstwhile-Pandyan territories prompted a number of claimants to the Pandya throne to cause a civil war in which the Sinhalas and the Cholas were involved by proxy. Details of the Pandyan civil war and the role played by the Cholas and Sinhalas, are present in the ''Mahavamsa+'' as well as the Pallavarayanpettai Inscriptions.Chopra ''et al.'', pp 128–129
The Cholas, under Rajaraja Chola III+ and later, his successor Rajendra Chola III+, were quite weak and therefore, experienced continuous trouble. One feudatory, the Kadava+ chieftain Kopperunchinga I+, even held Rajaraja Chola III as hostage for sometime.Tripathi, p 472 At the close of the 12th century, the growing influence of the Hoysalas replaced the declining Chalukyas as the main player in the Kannada country, but they too faced constant trouble from the Seunas and the Kalachuris, who were occupying Chalukya capital because those empires were their new rivals. So naturally, the Hoysalas found it convenient to have friendly relations with the Cholas from the time of Kulothunga Chola III+, who had defeated Hoysala Veera Ballala II, who had subsequent marital relations with the Chola monarch. This continued during the time of Rajaraja Chola III+ the son and successor of Kulothunga Chola III+Majumdar, p 410
The Pandya+s in the south had risen to the rank of a great power who ultimately banished the Hoysalas from Malanadu or Kannada country, who were allies of the Chola+s from Tamil country and the demise of the Cholas themselves ultimately was caused by the Pandyas in 1279. The Pandyas first steadily gained control of the Tamil country as well as territories in Sri Lanka+, Chera country, Telugu country under Maravarman Sundara Pandiyan II and his able successor Jatavarman Sundara Pandyan+ before inflicting several defeats on the joint forces of the Cholas+ under Rajaraja Chola III, his successor Rajendra Chola III and the Hoysalas+ under Someshwara, his son Ramanatha Rajendra III tried to survive by aligning with the Kadava Pallavas and the Hoysalas in turn in order to counter the constantly rising power of the Pandyans who were the major players in the Tamil country from 1215 and had intelligently consolidated their position in Madurai-Rameswaram-Ilam-Cheranadu and Kanniyakumari belt, and had been steadily increasing their territories in the Kaveri belt between Dindigul-Tiruchy-Karur-Satyamangalam as well as in the Kaveri Delta i.e., Thanjavur-Mayuram-Chidambaram-Vriddhachalam-Kanchi, finally marching all the way up to Arcot—Tirumalai-Nellore-Visayawadai-Vengi-Kalingam belt by 1250.
The Pandyas+ steadily routed both the Hoysalas and the Cholas. They also dispossessed the Hoysalas, who had been overestimating their power by interfering in the politics of Tamil country by routing them under Jatavarman Sundara Pandiyan at Kannanur Kuppam and chased them back to the Mysore plateau and stopped the war only thereafter. At the close of Rajendra's reign, the Pandyan empire was at the height of prosperity and had taken the place of the Chola empire in the eyes of the foreign observers. The last recorded date of Rajendra III is 1279. There is no evidence that Rajendra was followed immediately by another Chola prince.Chopra ''et al.'', p 130 The Hoysalas were routed from Kannanur Kuppam around 1279 by Kulasekhara Pandiyan and in the same war the last Chola emperor Rajendra III was routed and the Chola empire ceased to exist thereafter. Thus the Chola empire was completely overshadowed by the Pandyan empire and sank into obscurity and ceased to exist by the end of the 13th century.
In the age of the Cholas, the whole of South India was, for the first time ever, brought under a single government.The only other time when peninsular India would be brought under one umbrella before the Independence+ was during the Vijayanagara Empire+ (1336–1614) when a serious attempt was made to face and solve the problems of public administration. The Cholas' system of government was monarchical, as in the Sangam age. However, there was little in common between the local chiefdoms of the earlier period and the imperial-like states of Rajaraja Chola and his successors. The administration of the Imperial Chola Dynasty assumed a high degree of complexity.''Administrative System in India: Vedic Age to 1947'' by U. B. Singh p.77 There was an expansion of the administrative structure during the Imperial Chola period(10th to 13th century) and particularly from the reign of Raja Raja Chola I+ onwards as there were larger numbers of terms for officials and offices compared to earlier periods. The Imperial Chola Dynasty had a large land revenue department consisting of several rungs which was largely concerned with maintaining accounts.The assessment and collection of revenue were undertaken by corporate bodies such as the ur, nadu, sabha, nagaram and sometimes by local chieftains who passed the revenue to the centre. During the reign of Raja Raja Chola I+ the Chola state initiated a massive project of land survey and assessment and there was a reorganization of the Empire into units known as valanadus. Before the reign of Raja Raja Chola I+ huge parts of the Chola territory was ruled by hereditary lords and local princes who were in a loose alliance with the Chola rulers. But from the reign of Raja Raja Chola I+ until the reign of Vikrama Chola+ in 1133 CE when the Chola power was at its peak, these hereditary lords and local princes virtually vanished from the Chola records and were either replaced or turned into dependent officials. Through these dependent officials the administration was improved and the Chola Emperors were able to exercise a closer control over the different parts of the Empire.
For the administrative convenience and efficiency the Chola Empire was divided into Mandalams which were further divided into Valanadus and the Valanadus were sub-divided into Kutrams and Kottams.
The order of the King was first communicated by the executive officer to the local authorities. Afterwards the records of the transaction was drawn up and attested by a number of witnesses who were either local magnates or government officers. The king was the central authority assisted by his ministers and other officers.History and Civics IX Rachna Sagar p.141 The king visited various parts of his kingdom and always prepared to provide relief to the people.
The Chola kingdom was divided into several provinces called Mandalams. Each province was governed by the governors. The provinces were divided into divisions called Kottams.
The divisions were further divided into district called Nadus which were further divided into Tehsil comprising a group of villages.
Between 980 and c. 1150, the Chola Empire comprised the entire south Indian peninsula, extending from the east coast to the west coast and bounded to the north by an irregular line along the Tungabhadra river and the Vengi frontier. Although Vengi had a separate political existence, it was closely connected to the Chola Empire and the Chola dominion virtually extended up to the banks of the Godavari river.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 448
Thanjavur and later Gangaikonda Cholapuram were the imperial capitals. However both Kanchipuram and Madurai were considered to be regional capitals in which occasional courts were held. The king was the supreme leader and a benevolent authoritarian. His administrative role consisted of issuing oral commands to responsible officers when representations were made to him.For example, Rajaraja is mentioned in the Layden copperplate grant to have issued an oral order for a gift to a Buddhist vihara at Nagapattinam, and his orders were written out by a clerk – K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 461 A powerful bureaucracy assisted the king in the tasks of administration and in executing his orders. Due to the lack of a legislature or a legislative system in the modern sense, the fairness of king's orders dependent on his morality and belief in ''Dharma''. The Chola kings built temples and endowed them with great wealth. The temples acted not only as places of worship but also as centres of economic activity, benefiting the community as a whole. Some of the output of villages throughout the kingdom was given to temples that reinvested some of the wealth accumulated as loans to the settlements. The temple served as a centre for redistribution of wealth and contributed towards the integrity of the kingdom.
The Chola Dynasty had a professional army and the King was the supreme commander of the military. The army had a fourfold division. The army was built around the cavalry, the elephant corps, several divisions of infantry and a navy. There were regiments of bowmen and swordsmen while the swordsmen were the most permanent and dependable troops. The Chola army was spread all over the country and was stationed in local garrisons or military camps known as "Kodagams. The elephants played a major role in the army and the Chola Dynasty had numerous war-elephants. The war-elephants carried on their backs houses or huge Howdahs which were full of soldiers who shot arrows at long range and who fought with spears at close quarters.
The Chola rulers built several Palaces and fortifications to protect their cities and the fortifications were mostly made up of bricks but other materials like stone, wood and mud were also used to build fortifications and walls. According to the ancient Tamil text "Silappadikaram" the Tamil Kings used for the defenses of their forts catapults to throw stones, huge cauldrons to hold boiling water or molten lead and hooks, chains and traps.
The soldiers of the Chola Dynasty used several weapons like swords, bows, javelins, spears and shields which were made up of steel. Particularly the famous Wootz steel+, which has a long history in south India dating back to the period before the Christian era, seems also be used to produce weapons. The south Indian Wootz steel+ was also a major export item during this period.The army consisted of people from different castes but the warriors of the Kaikolar+ caste and Vellalar+ caste played a prominent role in the Chola army. The warriors of the Mukkulathor+ community also formed a part of the Chola army and they were known since ancient times for being expert soldiers and warlike people.
A famous ancient martial art called Silambam+ was patronized by the Chola rulers. Ancient and medieval Tamil texts mention different forms of martial traditions but the ultimate expression of the loyalty of the warrior to his commander was a form of martial suicide called "Navakandam". The medieval text "Kalingathu Parani", which celebrates the victory of the Chola Emperor Kulothunga Chola I+ and his general in the battle for Kalinga (India)+, describes the practice in detail.
Land revenue and trade tax were the main source of income.
The Chola rulers issued their coins in gold, silver and copper. The Chola economy was based on three tiers—at the local level, agricultural settlements formed the foundation''An Atlas and Survey of South Asian History'' by Karl J. Schmidt p.32
to commercial towns nagaram, which acted as redistribution centers for externally produced items bound for consumption in the local economy and as sources of products made by nagaram artisans for the international trade. At the top of this economic pyramid were the elite merchant groups,"''samayam''", who organized and dominated the regions international maritime trade. One of the main articles which were exported to foreign countries were cotton cloth.Uraiyur, the capital of the early Chola rulers, was a famous centre for cotton textiles which were praised by Tamil poets. The south Indian Wootz steel+ was also a major export item during this period. The Chola rulers actively encouraged the weaving industry and derived revenue from it.''A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th century'' by Upinder Singh p.599 During this period the weavers started to organize themselves into guilds. The weavers had their own residential sector in all towns. The most important weaving communities in early medieval times were the Saliyar and Kaikolar+. During the Chola period silk weaving attained a high degree and Kanchipuram+ became one of the main centers for silk.
Metal crafts reached its zenith during the 10th to 11th centuries because the Chola rulers like Chembian Maadevi extended their patronage to metal craftsmen.
The farmers occupied one of the highest positions in society.''History of People and Their Environs: Essays in Honour of Prof. B.S. Chandrababu'' by S.Ganeshram p.319 These were the Vellalar+ community who formed the nobility or the landed aristocracy of the country and who were economically a powerful group.''A History of Ancient and Early Medieval India: From the Stone Age to the 12th Century'' by Upinder Singh p.592 Agriculture was the principal occupation for many people. Besides the landowners, there were others dependent on agriculture. The Vellalar+ community was the dominant secular aristocratic caste under the Chola rulers, providing the courtiers, most of the army officers, the lower ranks of the bureaucracy and the upper layer of the peasantry. A fairly large class of landless laborers assisted in the operations and shared the proceeds of agriculture.
In almost all villages the distinction between persons paying the land-tax(iraikudigal) and those who did not was clearly established. There was a class of hired day-labourers who assisted in agricultural operations on the estates of other people and received a daily wage. All cultivable land was held in one of the three broad classes of tenure which can be distinguished as peasant proprietorship called vellan-vagai, service tenure and eleemosynary tenure resulting from charitable gifts. The vellan-vagai was the ordinary ryotwari village of modern times, having direct relations with the government and paying a land-tax liable to revision from time to time. The vellan-vagai villages fell into two broad classes- one directly remitting a variable annual revenue to the state and the other paying dues of a more or less fixed character to the public
institutions like temples to which they were assigned.''The Trading World of the Tamil Merchant'' by Kanakalatha Mukund p.30-32 The prosperity of an agricultural country depends to a large extent on the facilities provided for irrigation. Apart from sinking wells and excavating tanks, the Chola rulers threw mighty stone dams across the Kaveri and other rivers, and cut out channels to distribute water over large tracts of land. Rajendra Chola I+ dug near his capital an artificial lake, which was filled with water from the Kolerun and the Vellar rivers. A very large number of irrigation tanks are mentioned in the records.
There existed a brisk internal trade in several articles carried on by the organized mercantile corporations in various parts of the country. The metal industries and the jewellers art had reached a high degree of excellence. The manufacture of sea-salt was carried on under government supervision and control. Trade was carried on by merchants organized in guilds. The guilds described sometimes by the terms nanadesis were a powerful autonomous corporation of merchants which visited different countries in the course of their trade. They had their own mercenary army for the protection of their merchandise. There were also local organizations of merchants called "''nagaram''" in big centers of trade like Kanchipuram and Mamallapuram.
Hospitals (Adula Salai) were maintained by the Chola Kings.''Economic History of India'' by N. Jayapalan p.49 It is mentioned in few records. For the maintenance of hospitals lands were given by the government. From Tirumukkudal inscription we know that a hospital was named after Vira Chola. Many diseases were cured by the doctors of the Hospital. It was under the control of a chief physician. He was paid annually 80 Kalams of paddy, 8 Kasus and a grant of certain land. Apart from the doctors, the other staff members of the hospital like a nurse, barber (performed minor operations) and waterman were also given remuneration. The Chola queen Kundavai also established a hospital in the capital Tanjavur and gave land for the perpetual maintenance of the hospital. Treatment was given to the following diseases in the hospital: tuberculosis+, jaundice+, fistula+, dropsy+, anaemic diseases, enlargement of the spleen and general disability.
The Chola Navy (Tamil: சோழர் கடற்படை; Cōḻar kadatpadai) comprised the naval forces of the Chola Empire along with several other naval-arms of the country. The Chola navy played a vital role in the expansion of the Chola Empire, including the conquest of the Ceylon islands and naval raids on Sri Vijaya (present-day Indonesia, Malaysia and southern Thailand).
The navy grew both in size and status during the Medieval Cholas reign. The Chola Admirals commanded much respect and prestige in the society. The navy commanders also acted as diplomats in some instances. From 900 to 1100, the navy had grown from a small backwater entity to that of a potent power projection and diplomatic symbol in all of Asia, but was gradually reduced in significance when the Cholas fought land battles for subjugating the Chalukyas of Andhra-Kannada area in South India.
During the Chola period several guilds, communities and castes emerged. The guild was one of the most significant institutions of south India and merchants organized themselves into guilds.The Trading World of the Tamil Merchant: Evolution of Merchant Capitalism in the Coromandel by Kanakalatha Mukund p.29-30 The best known of these were the Manigramam and Ayyavole guilds though other guilds such as Anjuvannam and Valanjiyar were also in existence. The farmers occupied one of the highest positions in society. These were the Vellalar+ community who formed the nobility or the landed aristocracy of the country and who were economically a powerful group. The Vellalar+ community was the dominant secular aristocratic caste under the Chola rulers, providing the courtiers, most of the army officers, the lower ranks of the bureaucracy and the upper layer of the peasantry. The Vellalar+ were also sent to northern Sri Lanka by the Chola rulers as settlers. The Ulavar community were working in the field which was associated with agriculture and the peasants were known as Kalamar.
The Kaikolar+ community were weavers and merchants but they also maintained armies.''The Political Economy of Craft Production: Crafting Empire in South India'', by Carla M. Sinopoli p.188 During the Chola period they had predominant trading and military roles. During the reign of the Imperial Chola rulers (10th-13th century) there were major changes in the temple administration and land ownership.''Bhakti Poetry in Medieval India: Its Inception, Cultural Encounter and Impact'' by Neeti M. Sadarangani p.16 There was more involvement of non-Brahmin elements in the temple administration. This can be attributed to the shift in money power. Skilled classes like the weavers and the merchant-class had become prosperous. Land ownership was no longer a privilege of the Brahmins (priest caste) and the Vellalar+ land owners.
There is little information on the size and the density of the population during the Chola reign. The stability in the core Chola region enabled the people to lead a productive and contented life. There is only one recorded instance of civil disturbance during the entire period of Chola reign.—during the short reign of Virarajendra Chola, which possibly had some sectarian roots. However, there were reports of widespread famine caused by natural calamities.
The quality of the inscriptions of the regime indicates a high level of literacy and education. The text in these inscriptions was written by court poets and engraved by talented artisans. Education in the contemporary sense was not considered important; there is circumstantial evidence to suggest that some village councils organised schools to teach the basics of reading and writing to children, although there is no evidence of systematic educational system for the masses. Vocational education was through hereditary training in which the father passed on his skills to his sons. Tamil was the medium of education for the masses; Religious monasteries (''matha'' or ''gatika'') were centres of learning and received government support.Rajendra Chola I endowed a large college in which more than 280 students learnt from 14 teachers – K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', p 293The students studied a number of subjects in these colleges, including philosophy (''anvikshiki''), Vedas+ (''trayi'' – the threefold Vedas of Rigveda+, Yajurveda+ and Samaveda+. The fourth Atharvaveda+ was considered a non-religious text.), economics (''vartta''), government (''dandaniti''), grammar, prosody+, etymology, astronomy, logic (''tarka''), medicine (''ayurveda''), politics (''arthasastra'') and music. – K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', p 292
The Cholas excelled in foreign trade and maritime activity, extending their influence overseas to China and Southeast Asia. Towards the end of the 9th century, southern India had developed extensive maritime and commercial activity.Kulke and Rothermund, p 118 The south Indian guilds played a major role in interregional and overseas trade. The best known of these were the Manigramam and Ayyavole guilds who followed the conquering Chola armies. The encouragement by the Chola court furthered the expansion of Tamil merchant associations such as the Ayyavole and Manigramam guilds into Southeast Asia and China. The Cholas, being in possession of parts of both the west and the east coasts of peninsular India, were at the forefront of these ventures. The Tang dynasty+ of China, the Srivijaya+ empire under the Sailendras, and the Abbasid+ Kalifat at Baghdad+ were the main trading partners.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 604
Some credit for the emergence of a world market must also go to the Chola Dynasty.''Buddhism, Diplomacy, and Trade: The Realignment of Sino-Indian Relations'' by Tansen Sen p.156 The Chola Dynasty played a significant role in linking the markets of China to the rest of the world. In fact, the market structure and economic policies of the Chola Dynasty were more conducive to a large-scale, cross-regional market trade than those enacted by the Song court. The following passage from the southern Indian kingdom, gives their rationale for engagement in foreign trade: "Make the merchants of distant foreign countries who import elephants and good horses attach to yourself by providing them with villages and decent dwellings in the city, by affording them daily audience, presents and allowing them profits. Then those articles will never go to your enemies."
Chinese Song Dynasty+ reports record that an embassy from ''Chulian'' (Chola) reached the Chinese court in the year 1077,Kulke and Rothermund, p 117 and that the king of the Chulien at the time, Kulothunga I, was called ''Ti-hua-kia-lo''.Mukund p. 92 This embassy was a trading venture and was highly profitable to the visitors, who returned with copper coins in exchange for articles of tributes, including glass articles, and spices. Chinese records rarely described Tamil merchants. On the other hand, a fragmentary Tamil inscription found in Sumatra+ Probably, the motive behind Rajendra's expedition to Srivijaya was the protection of the merchants' interests.
There was tremendous agrarian expansion during the rule of the imperial Chola Dynasty (c. 900-1270 AD) all over Tamil Nadu and particularly in the Kaveri Basin.''History of Agriculture in India, Up to c. 1200 A.D.'' by Lallanji Gopal p.501 Most of the canals of the Kaveri River belongs to this period e.g., Uyyakondan canal, Rajendran vaykkal, Sembian Mahadegvi vaykkal. There was a well-developed and highly efficient system of water management from the village level upwards. The increase in the royal patronage and also the number of devadana and bramadeya lands which increased the role of the temples and village assemblies in the field. Committees like eri-variyam(tank-committee) and totta-variam(garden committees) were active as also the temples with their vast resources in land, men and money. The tanks that came up during the Chola period are too many to be listed here. But a few most outstanding may be briefly mentioned. Rajendra Chola built a huge tank named Solagangam in his capital city Gangaikonda Solapuram and was described as the liquid pillar of victory. About 16 miles long, it was provided with sluices and canals for irrigating the lands in the neighboring areas. Another very large lake of this period, which even today seems an important source of irrigation was the Viranameri near Kattumannarkoil in South Arcot district founded by Parantaka Chola. Other famous lakes of this period are Madurantakam, Sundra-cholapereri, Kundavai-Pereri (after a Chola queen.
Kaveripoompattinam on the coast near the Kaveri delta was a major port town.Tripathi, p 457 Ptolemy knew of this and the other port town of Nagappattinam+ as the most important centres of Cholas. These two towns became hubs of trade and commerce and attracted many religious faiths, including Buddhism.The Buddhist work ''Milinda Panha'' dated to the early Christian era, mentions Kolapttna among the best-known sea ports on the Chola coast. Nilakanta Sastri, ''The CōĻas'', p 23 Roman ships found their way into these ports. Roman coins dating from the early centuries of the common era have been found near the Kaveri delta.Nagaswamy,
The other major towns were Thanjavur, Uraiyur and Kudanthai, now known as Kumbakonam+. After Rajendra Chola moved his capital to Gangaikonda Cholapuram+, Thanjavur lost its importance. The later Chola kings moved around their capitals frequently and made cities such as Chidambaram+, Madurai+ and Kanchipuram their regional capitals.
Every village was a self-governing unit.Tripathi, pp 474–475 A number of villages constituted a larger entity known as a ''Kurram'', ''Nadu'' or ''Kottam'', depending on the area.Stein, p 20K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', p 185 A number of ''Kurrams'' constituted a ''valanadu''. These structures underwent constant change and refinement throughout the Chola period.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 465
Justice was mostly a local matter in the Chola Empire; minor disputes were settled at the village level. Punishment for minor crimes were in the form of fines or a direction for the offender to donate to some charitable endowment. Even crimes such as manslaughter or murder were punished with fines. Crimes of the state, such as treason, were heard and decided by the king himself; the typical punishment in these cases was either execution or confiscation of property.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 477
Under the Cholas, the Tamil country reached new heights of excellence in art+, religion+, music+ and literature+. In all of these spheres, the Chola period marked the culmination of movements that had begun in an earlier age under the Pallavas.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', p 418 Monumental architecture in the form of majestic temples+ and sculpture+ in stone and bronze+ reached a finesse never before achieved in India.It was, however, in bronze sculptures that the Chola craftsmen excelled, producing images rivalling the best anywhere. Thapar, p 403
The Chola conquest of Kadaram (Kedah+) and Srivijaya, and their continued commercial contacts with the Chinese Empire+, enabled them to influence the local cultures.Kulke and Rothermund, p 159 Many of the surviving examples of the Hindu cultural influence+ found today throughout the Southeast Asia owe much to the legacy of the Cholas.The great temple complex at Prambanan+ in Indonesia+ exhibit a number of similarities with the South Indian architecture. K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 709
The Cholas continued the temple-building traditions of the Pallava dynasty and contributed significantly to the Dravidian temple design.Tripathi, p 479 They built a number of Siva+ temples along the banks of the river Kaveri. The template for these and future temples was formulated by Aditya I and Parantaka. The Chola temple architecture has been appreciated for its magnificence as well as delicate workmanship, ostensibly following the rich traditions of the past bequeathed to them by the Pallava Dynasty.''Temples of South India'' by V. V. Subba Reddy p.110 Ferguson has very abtly remarked that "the Chola artists conceived like giants and finished like jewelers". A new development in Chola art that characterized the Dravidian architecture in later times was the addition of a huge gateway called gopuram to the enclosure of the temple, which had gradually took its form and attained maturity under the Pandya Dynasty. The Chola school of art also spread to Southeast Asia+ and influenced the architecture and art of Southeast Asia+.
Temple building received great impetus from the conquests and the genius of Rajaraja Chola and his son Rajendra Chola I. The maturity and grandeur to which the Chola architecture had evolved found expression in the two temples of Thanjavur and Gangaikondacholapuram. The magnificent Siva temple of Thanjavur+, completed around 1009, is a fitting memorial to the material achievements of the time of Rajaraja. The largest and tallest of all Indian temples of its time, it is at the apex of South Indian architecture. The temple of Gangaikondacholisvaram at Gangaikondacholapuram+, the creation of Rajendra Chola, was intended to excel its predecessor. Completed around 1030, only two decades after the temple at Thanjavur and in the same style, the greater elaboration in its appearance attests the more affluent state of the Chola Empire under Rajendra.Nagasamy R, ''Gangaikondacholapuram'' The Brihadisvara Temple, the temple of Gangaikondacholisvaram and the Airavatesvara Temple+ at Darasuram+ were declared as World Heritage Site+s by the UNESCO+ and are referred to as the Great living Chola temples+.
The Chola period is also remarkable for its sculptures and bronzes. Among the existing specimens in museums around the world and in the temples of South India may be seen many fine figures of Siva in various forms, such as Vishnu+ and his consort Lakshmi+, and the Saivaite saints. Though conforming generally to the iconographic conventions established by long tradition, the sculptors worked with great freedom in the 11th and the 12th centuries to achieve a classic grace and grandeur. The best example of this can be seen in the form of Nataraja+ the Divine Dancer.Wolpert, p174
The age of the Imperial Cholas (850–1200) was the golden age of Tamil culture, marked by the importance of literature. Chola records
The revival of Hinduism from its nadir during the Kalabhras spurred the construction of numerous temples and these in turn generated Saiva and Vaishnava devotional literature. Jain and Buddhist authors flourished as well, although in fewer numbers than in previous centuries. ''Jivaka-chintamani+'' by Tirutakkatevar+ and ''Sulamani'' by Tolamoli are among notable by non-Hindu authors.''Encyclopaedia of Indian literature, vol. 2'', p 1195 The art of Tirutakkatevar is marked by all the qualities of great poetry. It is considered as the model for Kamban+ for his masterpiece ''Ramavataram+''.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', p 340 The grammarian Buddhamitra wrote a text on Tamil grammar called Virasoliyam. Commentaries were written on the great text Tolkāppiyam which deals with grammar but which also mentions ethics of warfare. Periapuranam was another remarkable literary piece of this period.''Concise Encyclopaedia Of India'' by Kulwant Rai Gupta, Amita Gupta p.288 This work is in a sense a national epic of the Tamil people because it treats of the lives of the Saints who lived in all the different parts of Tamil Nadu and belonged to all classes of society, men and women, high and low, educated and uneducated.
Kamban+ flourished during the reign of Kulothunga Chola III+. His ''Ramavatharam+'' (also referred to as ''Kambaramayanam'') is an epic in Tamil literature, and although the author states that he followed Valmiki+'s ''Ramayana+'', it is generally accepted that his work is not a simple translation or adaptation of the Sanskrit epic.''Legend of Ram'' By Sanujit Ghose Kamban imports into his narration the colour and landscape of his own time; his description of Kosala+ is an idealised account of the features of the Chola country.''Rays and Ways of Indian Culture'' By D. P. DubeyChopra ''et al.'', p 116
Jayamkondar's masterpiece ''Kalingattuparani'' is an example of narrative poetry that draws a clear boundary between history and fictitious conventions. This describes the events during Kulothunga Chola I's war in Kalinga and depicts not only the pomp and circumstance of war, but the gruesome details of the field.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''A History of South India'', p 20 The famous Tamil poet Ottakuttan was a contemporary of Kulothunga Chola I and served at the courts of three of Kulothunga's successors. Ottakuttan wrote ''Kulothunga Cholan Ula'', a poem extolling the virtues of the Chola king.
"Nannul" is a work on Tamil grammar which discusses all 5 branches of grammar. It is one of the most distinguished normative grammar of literary Tamil.
The impulse to produce devotional religious literature continued into the Chola period and the arrangement of the Saiva+ canon into 11 books was the work of Nambi Andar Nambi, who lived close to the end of 10th century.Chopra ''et al.'', p 115 However, relatively few Vaishnavite+ works were composed during the later Chola period, possibly because of the apparent animosity towards the Vaishnavites by the later Chola monarchs.K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 681
Chola rulers took an active interest in the development of temple centers and used the temples to widen the sphere of their royal authority.''Bhakti Poetry in Medieval India: Its Inception, Cultural Encounter and Impact'' by Neeti M. Sadarangani: p.15 They established educational institutions and hospitals around the temple, enhanced the beneficial aspects of the role of the temple, and projected the royalty as a very powerful and genial presence. The record of Virarajendra Chola+ dated in his fifth year relates to the maintenance of a school in the Jananamandapa within the temple for the study of the Vedas, Sastras, Grammar, and Rupavatara, as well as a hostel for students.''South Indian Shrines'', Illustrated by P. V. Jagadisa Ayyar p.23 The students were provided with food, bathing oil on Saturdays, and oil for pups. A hospital named Virasolan was provided with fifteen beds for sick people. The items of expense set apart for their comforts are rice, a doctor, a surgeon, two maid servants for nursing the patients, and a general servant for the hospital.
In general, Cholas were the adherents of Hinduism+. Throughout their history, they were not swayed by the rise of Buddhism and Jainism+ as were the kings of the Pallava+ and Pandya+ dynasties. Even the early Cholas followed a version of the classical Hindu faith. There is evidence in ''Purananuru+'' for Karikala Chola's faith in Saivism+ in the Tamil country.''Purananuru'' (poem 224) movingly expresses his faith and the grief caused by his passing away. Kocengannan, another early Chola, was celebrated in both Sangam literature and in the Saiva canon as a saint.
While the Cholas did build their largest and most important temple dedicated to Lord Shiva, it can be by no means concluded that either they were staunch Saivites or followers of Saivism only or that they were not favourably disposed to other faiths. This is borne out by the fact that the second Chola king Aditya I himself built quite a few temples for Lord Siva and for Lord Vishnu. In CE 890, his inscriptions speak of his contributions to the construction of the Ranganatha Temple at Srirangapatnam (now in Mandya district of Karnataka) in the country of Western Gangas who were both his feudatories and had marital relations with him. During the time of Aditya I (871–903 CE) the Gangas of Kannada country had recognized his superiority which he acknowledged by marrying into that family and making grant contributions to the construction of the Sri Ranganatha temple at modern Srirangapatnam. Aditya I regularly gave many endowments to the Sri Ranganatha Temple at Srirangam around CE 896 and issued an inscriptional dictat pronouncing that the great temples of Siva and the Ranganatha temple at Srirangam to be the 'Kuladhanam' of the Chola emperors.
It was Aditya I's dictat which was faithfully carried out by his illustrious son Parantaka I and his successors wherein it was declared in edicts that the Siva Temple of Chidambaram (at that time the grand Siva temples of Tanjore and Gangaikonda Cholapuram were not in existence) and the Sri Ranganatha Swami temple of Srirangam were the "Kuladhanams", i.e., tutelary (deities) treasures of the Chola emperors. This dictat was repeated around 300 years back when the last great Chola King, Kulothunga III, the builder of the great Sarabeswarar Temple at Tribhuvanam on the outskirts of Kumbakonam, hails Lord Ranganatha at Srirangam in an inscription in the Srirangam Koil, as his 'tutelary deity'. As per findings of Dr. Hultzsch, the great epigraphist, in this inscription acknowledgment is made to the earlier great Chola king Parantaka about declaring the Chidambaram (Siva) Koil and the Srirangam (Vishnu) Koil as "Kuladhanams" of the Cholas—a pointer to the fact that the Cholas were secular and patronized equally all religions and sub-sects within the same religion. Another proof of this is the existence of as many as 40 Vaishnava Divyadesams out of 108 such temples in the Chola country, which are functioning and flourishing even today.
Chola king Sundara (Parantaka II) was a staunch devotee of the reclining Vishnu (Vadivu Azhagiya Nambi) at Anbil in the banks of Cauvery on the outskirts of Tiruchy, to whom he gave numerous gifts and embellishments, and prayed before him by keeping his sword before the deity, beforeo his proceeding for war for regaining the territories in and around Kanchi and Arcot from the waning Rashtrakutas and while leading expeditions against both Madurai and Ilam (Sri Lanka).Tripathi, p 480 Parantaka I+ and Sundara Chola+ endowed and built temples for Siva+ and Vishnu. Rajaraja Chola I patronised Buddhists and provided for the construction of the Chudamani Vihara+ (a Buddhist monastery) in Nagapattinam+ at the request of the Srivijaya Sailendra king.''South Indian Inscriptions'', Vol 3The name of the Sailendra king was Sri Chulamanivarman and the Vihara was named 'Chudamani vihara' in his honour. K.A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 214 While it is true that the biggest and grandest temples of the Cholas were dedicated to Lord Siva, all Chola kings especially from Aditya to Rajendra IV built great temples for Lord Vishnu and gave numerous grants and gifts to them.
During the period of Later Cholas, there were supposedly instances of intolerance towards Vaishnavites+, especially towards Ramanuja+, the acharya of the Vaishnavites. Kulothunga Chola II+, a staunch Saivite, is said to have removed a statue of Vishnu from the Siva temple at Chidambaram, though there are no epigraphical evidences to support this theory. There is an inscription from 1160 that the custodians of Siva temples who had social intercourses with Vaishnavites would forfeit their property. However, this is more of a direction to the Saivite community by its religious heads than any kind of dictat by a Chola emperor. While Chola kings built their largest temples for Siva and even while emperors like Raja Raja Chola I held titles like 'Sivapadasekharan', in none of their inscriptions did the Chola emperors proclaim that their clan only and solely followed Saivism or that Saivism was the state religion during their rule.K. A. Nilakanta Sastri+, ''The CōĻas'', p 645
The history of the Chola dynasty has inspired many Tamil authors to produce literary and artistic creations during the last several decades. The most important work of this genre is the popular ''Ponniyin Selvan+'' (The son of ''Ponni''), a historical novel in Tamil+ written by Kalki Krishnamurthy+. Written in five volumes, this narrates the story of Rajaraja Chola.Das, p 109 ''Ponniyin Selvan'' deals with the events leading up to the ascension of Uttama Chola+ to the Chola throne. Kalki had utilised the confusion in the succession to the Chola throne after the demise of Sundara Chola. This book was serialised in the Tamil periodical ''Kalki+'' during the mid-1950s. The serialisation lasted for nearly five years and every week its publication was awaited with great interest.
Kalki's earlier historical romance ''Parthiban Kanavu+'' deals with the fortunes of an imaginary Chola prince Vikraman, who was supposed to have lived as a feudatory of the Pallava king Narasimhavarman I+ during the 7th century. The period of the story lies within the interregnum during which the Chola in eclipse before Vijayalaya Chola revived their fortunes. ''Parthiban Kanavu'' was also serialised in the ''Kalki'' weekly during the early 1950s.
Sandilyan+, another popular Tamil novelist, wrote ''Kadal Pura'' in the 1960s. It was serialised in the Tamil weekly Kumudam+. ''Kadal Pura'' is set during the period when Kulothunga Chola I was in exile from the Vengi kingdom, after he was denied the throne. ''Kadal Pura'' speculates the whereabouts of Kulothunga during this period. Sandilyan's earlier work ''Yavana Rani+'' written in the early 1960s is based on the life of Karikala Chola. More recently, Balakumaran+ wrote the novel ''Udaiyar+'' based on the circumstances surrounding Rajaraja Chola's construction of the Brihadisvara Temple in Thanjavur.